The Guides to Social Policy Law is a collection of publications designed to assist decision makers administering social policy law. The information contained in this publication is intended only as a guide to relevant legislation/policy. The information is accurate as at the date listed at the bottom of the page, but may be subject to change. To discuss individual circumstances please contact Services Australia.

3.1.7.14 Notional assessments

Summary

This topic provides information about the use of notional assessments in the maintenance income test (MIT) for child support agreements made on or after 1 July 2008. It covers the following topics:

  • notional assessments
  • private collect agreements
  • Child Support collect agreements
  • treatment of child support arrears, and
  • significant changes to binding agreements.

For child support agreements, Child Support will work out the annual rate of child support that would otherwise be payable under the child support formula if there was no agreement. This is called the 'Child Support notional assessment' because it is a 'notional' rather than an actual rate of child support. The notional assessment is determined by Child Support in the same manner as a child support assessment, and is the annual rate of child support that would be paid if the agreement was not in place. Once a child support agreement is accepted, calculation of FTB will be based on the notional assessment.

Example 1: Michael and Jane have registered for collection by Child Support a binding child support agreement for their son, Thomas. They have agreed that Michael will pay an annual rate of $4,000 in child support. The Child Support notional assessment is $5,000. The $5,000 is the amount that would have been payable had the agreement not been made. When applying the MIT in calculating Jane's FTB Part A rate, the notional amount of $5,000 will be used instead of the actual agreement amount of $4,000.

Example 2: Jason and Rachel have registered for collection by Child Support a binding child support agreement for their son, Lee. They have agreed that Jason will pay an annual rate of $6,000 in child support. The Child Support notional assessment is $4,000. The $4,000 is the amount that would have been payable had the agreement not been made. When applying the MIT in calculating Rachel's FTB Part A rate, the notional amount of $4,000 will be used instead of the actual agreement amount of $6,000.

Act reference: FAAct Schedule 1 clause 20B(2) Individual taken to have received notional assessed amount

CSA Act section 146A Simplified outline

Private collect agreements

If a child support agreement is made on or after 1 July 2008 and the child support is collected privately, the MIT for FTB Part A will use the notional amount of child support rather than the agreement amount.

Where a payee collects their child support through private arrangements, FTB will be calculated by using 100% of the notional assessed amount of child support. This is because it is assumed the payee will collect 100% of the child support liability.

Example: In Michael and Jane's example above, the notional amount of child support ($5,000) would be used in the MIT for FTB Part A to work out Jane's rate of FTB Part A.

Child Support collect agreements

If a child support agreement is made on or after 1 July 2008 and the child support is registered for collection by Child Support, special rules apply if less than 100% of the child support amount payable under the agreement is collected.

Where a payee arranges for child support to be collected by Child Support, FTB is assessed on the notional amount paid. This is a percentage of the notional assessment, where the percentage is the proportion of the agreement amount collected by Child Support and divided by the agreement amount.

If less than 100% of the agreement amount of child support is collected, the MIT will not use 100% of the notional amount. Instead, a percentage of this amount that is equal to the percentage of the agreement amount received is used.

Example 1: Mary's notional assessment amount is $20,000 but she makes an agreement with her ex-partner to receive $10,000 in child support for her 8 year old daughter. Over the income year, Mary only receives $5,000 from Child Support. To work out what amount should be used for the MIT, the amount collected ($5,000) is divided by the agreement amount ($10,000). This works out to be 50%. As Mary only received 50% of her agreement amount, only 50% (or $10,000) of the notional assessment amount ($20,000) is used for the MIT.

Example 2: Alex and Maria have a child support agreement and payments are registered for collection by Child Support. They have agreed that Maria is to receive an annual rate of $8,000 in child support from Alex. The notional amount of child support is $5,000. Child Support collects $6,000 in child support payments from Alex. This is equal to 75% of Alex and Maria's agreement amount of $8,000. This means that, when working out Maria's rate of FTB Part A, the MIT will use 75% of the notional amount of $5,000. That is, $3,750 will be used instead of the notional assessment amount of $5,000.

Act reference: FAAct Schedule 1 clause 20B(3) Underpayments

Policy reference: FA Guide 3.1.7.20 Estimating maintenance income, 3.1.7.30 Application of the maintenance income test, 3.1.7.05 Maintenance income credit

Provisional notional assessments

Once Child Support accepts a child support agreement, a provisional notional assessment must be made. This assessment is calculated taking into account both parents ATI and their most recent care details available for the children. Child Support must notify both parties of the provisional notional assessment, and both parties are entitled to seek variation of this.

A provisional notional assessment becomes a notional assessment either:

  • 14 days after the notice of the provisional notional assessment is received by all parties, or
  • if an application for variation was lodged, then on the day which it is varied, or is refused to be varied.

It is only once the provisional notional assessment becomes a notional assessment that it is used to calculate the FTB Part A entitlement.

A subsequent provisional notional assessment will be made where:

  • the child support agreement (3.1.6.45) remains in force and it is 3 years since the notional assessment was last calculated
  • the child support payable under the child support agreement (binding or limited) changes by more than 15%, or
  • there is a limited agreement, and either party has requested a new provisional notional assessment.

Act reference: CSA Act Part 7A Notional assessments

Policy reference: FA Guide 3.1.6.45 Child support agreements (post July 2008)

CS Guide 2.7.4 Effect of a child support agreement once accepted by the Registrar (other than lump sum payment provisions)

Treatment of child support arrears

If the payee receives more than the agreement amount, FTB is calculated on the notional assessed amount plus the additional amount received. The additional amount of child support is treated as actual arrears or, if there had been an underpayment of child support in a previous financial year, notional arrears.

Where there has been an underpayment, the notional factor is calculated, which ensures that any arrears received will have the same effect as if the child support had been paid in the financial year it was due. If there has been an underpayment in more than one financial year, the arrears will affect the oldest underpayment amount first.

The notional factor is the amount of the notional assessment not paid, divided by the actual agreement amount that has not been paid.

Example: If the agreement amount is $4,000 and only $3,000 is collected, and the notional assessment is $5,000 then:

  • the proportion of the agreement amount collected is 75%, which is equal to a notional amount paid of $3,750 (that is, 75% of $5,000)
  • the notional factor is calculated by dividing the notional amount underpaid by the agreement amount underpaid: $1,250 ($5,000 less $3,750) divided by $1,000 ($4,000 less $3,000). That is, a notional factor of 1.25.

Any arrears payments are multiplied by the notional factor to give the notional arrears amount. The payee's FTB is calculated on the notional assessed amount plus the notional arrears amount received.

Example: A child support agreement provides for payment of an annual child support amount of $4,000. Child Support collects the child support payments. At the end of the financial year, Child Support has collected $4,500. The notional assessment is $5,000.

In the previous financial year, Child Support collected $3,000, resulting in an underpayment amount of $1,000 for that year and a notional factor of 1.25 (see calculation in the above example). The additional amount of $500 collected in the current financial year, if multiplied by the notional factor, equals a notional arrears amount of $625 ($500 × 1.25). The payee's FTB would be calculated on the notional assessed amount of $5,000 plus the notional arrears amount of $625. The year 1 underpayment is reduced from $1,000 to $500, and the year 1 notional factor remains at 1.25.

If more than the agreement amount is collected and the payer does not have an underpayment from a previous financial year, FTB will be based on the notional assessment plus the additional amount received as actual arrears.

Example: The agreement amount is $3,000 and $4,500 is collected. The full agreement amount of child support has been collected in previous financial years. The notional assessment is $5,000. FTB will be based on $5,000 plus the additional amount received of $1,500, that is $6,500.

Act reference: FAAct Schedule 1 clause 20B Working out amounts of child maintenance using notional assessments, Schedule 1 clause 20C Working out amounts of child maintenance in relation to lump sum payments

Significant changes to binding agreements

Liable parent under binding agreement increases their level of care to more than 65%

From 1 July 2018, if the care arrangements of a child change significantly so that the liable parent under the binding agreement now has over 65% care of a child, the agreement will be suspended for 28 days, or up to 26 weeks in some cases, from when the change in care occurs. The agreement will then terminate, unless the former carer entitled to child support under the agreement regains care while the agreement is suspended.

If there was a child support assessment in place under the formula before the binding agreement was made, child support will be payable according to the provisions of the formula while the agreement is suspended, rather than the notional assessment that was in place while the agreement was active. The MAT requirement would be satisfied and the MIT would be calculated according to the actual amount payable under the formula.

If the binding agreement started the child support case, there is no underlying formula assessment that takes effect during the suspension. Reasonable maintenance action needs to be taken within 13 weeks to satisfy the MAT. To receive child support payments for the child, the parent who is an eligible carer would need to apply for an assessment under child support formula provisions since there is no assessment that existed before the child support agreement (CS Guide 2.7.5). Once this action is taken, the MIT will be based on the formula assessment.

Example: Alexander and Nina have a child support assessment based on the formula for their child Sofia. Alexander and Nina subsequently enter into a binding child support agreement for child Sofia. Alexander has 100% care of Sofia and receives FTB. The care arrangements change and Nina gains 100% care of Sofia. The agreement is suspended when the care change occurs as Alexander is no longer an eligible carer. While the agreement is suspended, child support is payable according to the provisions of the child support formula. Nina applies for FTB in respect of Sofia. No additional maintenance action is required and the MIT is based on the amount payable under the formula rather than the notional assessment. After 28 days, Sofia has not returned to the care of Alexander, and the agreement ends with effect from the day Sofia left the care of Alexander and went into Nina’s care. Child support remains payable according to the formula, and the MIT continues to be assessed under the formula.

Example: Sophie and Nick enter into a binding child support agreement for child Dean. Sophie and Nick have 85% and 15% care of Dean, respectively. The care arrangements change and Nick gains 100% care of Dean. The agreement is suspended when the care change occurs as Sophie is no longer an eligible carer. Because the binding agreement started the child support case, there is no underlying formula assessment that takes effect during the suspension and so neither Sophie nor Nick are liable to pay child support in respect of Dean. One week after the change of care Nick applies for FTB in respect of Dean. Two weeks later Nick elects to end the binding agreement and applies for an administrative assessment. This action has the effect of reviving the suspended agreement and allows child support to be payable according to the formula while the agreement remains suspended. Nick therefore satisfies the MAT. The MIT for Nick is based on the amount payable under the formula rather than the notional assessment. After 28 days, Dean has not returned to the care of Sophie, and the agreement ends with effect from the day Dean left the care of Sophie and went into Nick’s care. Child support remains payable according to the formula, and the MIT continues to be assessed under the formula.

Policy reference: FA Guide 3.1.6.45 Child support agreements (post July 2008)

CS Guide 2.7.5 Changing or terminating a child support agreement

Changes in care where carer entitled to child support under binding agreement remains an eligible carer

If the liable parent under a binding agreement gains additional care, they cannot unilaterally end the agreement if the carer entitled to receive child support is still an eligible carer (and is still entitled to receive child support according to the terms of the agreement). The parent may seek to end the agreement and stop paying child support for that child by getting agreement from the other party to terminate the agreement or to make a new binding agreement, or by seeking a court order which sets the agreement aside. If the other party does not agree and there is no court order, the binding agreement will remain in place. The liable parent may become eligible to receive FTB as a result of the care change. While the agreement remains in effect, the MAT requirement is satisfied and the change in circumstances will be reflected after a new provisional notional assessment is created.

For the carer entitled to receive child support under the agreement, the new notional assessment could result in a decrease in the amount used in the MIT (this could reduce to nil if they are being notionally assessed to pay child support to the liable parent under the agreement). Any maintenance the liable parent is notionally assessed to receive will not be included in their MIT because they are not receiving child support under the agreement.

Example: Roseanna and Christopher have a binding agreement in which Christopher is the liable parent. Roseanna has 100% care of their daughter Teleatha. The care arrangements subsequently change and Christopher assumes 65% care and Roseanna has 35%. Roseanna is still an eligible carer and remains entitled to receive child support under the agreement. Christopher remains liable to pay child support to Roseanna under the agreement. When a new provisional notional assessment is created, Christopher has 65% care of Teleatha and is notionally assessed to receive child support from Roseanna according to the formula. The amount Christopher is notionally assessed to receive is not used to calculate his FTB entitlement as he is still paying child support under the agreement. The amount of maintenance used to calculate Roseanna’s FTB entitlement is nil because she is still entitled to receive child support under the agreement and is notionally assessed to receive nil under the formula.

Act reference: FAAct section 3(1)-'maintenance income', Schedule 1 Clause 10 Effect of certain maintenance rights, Schedule 1 clause 20B Working out amounts of child maintenance using notional assessments

CSA Act section 34B Administrative assessment for child support period started by new agreement when support already payable, section 80D Terminating binding child support agreements, section 93 Liability to pay child support arises on acceptance of application where child support not already payable etc., section 151 Election to end administrative assessment

Policy reference: CS Guide 2.7.5 Changing or terminating a child support agreement, 2.7.6 Suspending a child support agreement

Last reviewed: