3.6.3.09 Case examples of conditions that may be assessed across multiple tables
Summary
The following examples demonstrate how conditions may be appropriately assessed across multiple Tables. Where it is unclear how a condition should be assessed, guidance should be sought from the HPAU (1.1.H.60).
Condition/diagnosis | Example of Impairment Table use |
---|---|
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) |
ASD is a developmental disorder often characterised by problems with social interaction and communication, as well as restricted, repetitive patterns of behaviour, interests or activities. The magnitude and severity of the symptoms can vary widely for individuals. A person with a functional impairment caused by this condition would be assessed under the table/s relevant to the impacted function. For example:
To avoid double counting, it is important not to rate the same functional impairment more than once. This means a person therefore should not be assessed under Table 7 – Brain Function and Table 9 – Intellectual Function, but under one of either Table 7 – Brain Function, or Table 9 – Intellectual Function. |
Myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) / chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) |
A person with CFS (also known as ME) may experience a range of symptoms including persistent fatigue, impaired short-term memory or concentration, muscle or joint pain, and unrefreshing sleep. A person with this condition may have functional impairments in a number of areas, depending on their presenting symptoms. In such cases, all relevant Tables should be used. For example:
The need to avoid double counting must be considered, for example, if lower limb muscle weakness and limited mobility is due to fatigue and has been assessed under Table 1 - Functions requiring Physical Exertion and Stamina, then a separate rating under Table 3 – Lower Limb Function for lower limb conditions is not appropriate. |
Chronic pain |
Acute pain is a symptom, which may result in short term loss of functional capacity in one or more areas of the body, but should resolve within a few months. Acute pain should not be assigned an impairment rating under the Tables. Chronic pain can be a primary chronic pain syndrome, for example, fibromyalgia or chronic regional pain syndrome, and where it has been diagnosed, reasonably treated and stabilised, the assessor should assess any functional impairment using the table relevant to the area of function affected. Chronic pain can also be a symptom of a condition and in these cases, the functional impairment of the pain should be rated using the relevant table/s to capture the appropriate level of impairment while ensuring the level of impairment is not overstated or double counted. For example:
|
Diabetes mellitus |
A person with diabetes mellitus that is reasonably treated and stabilised may experience a range of functional impairments. In such cases, all relevant Tables should be used. For example:
|
Renal failure |
A person with renal failure may experience a range of impairments and a number of Tables can be used to assess this. For example:
|
Epilepsy |
A person with epilepsy may experience seizures where they have involuntary loss or altered state of consciousness. This condition is primarily assigned a rating on Table 15 - Functions of Consciousness if it is diagnosed, reasonably treated and stabilised. Impairment points could also be applied on Table 7 - Brain Function for cognitive issues relating to epilepsy and antiepileptic medication. |
HIV/AIDS |
A person living with HIV (PLHIV) may present with a range of co-morbidities and functional impairments, even where their condition is diagnosed, reasonably treated and stabilised. The magnitude and severity of symptoms and side effects from treatment can vary widely for individuals. In the assessment of a person with HIV, all relevant Tables should be applied. For example:
|
Hypertension |
Hypertension that has been treated does not usually result in functional impairment. Where hypertension results in no or minimal functional impact, a rating of 0 under Table 1 should be assigned. If severe and treatment resistant hypertension has resulted in other diagnosed, reasonably treated and stabilised secondary conditions, such as damage to the eyes, kidneys or heart, the functional impacts of these conditions should be assessed under the relevant Tables. For example:
|
Cancer |
The functional impact of cancer is variable depending on the body parts or systems involved the nature and effectiveness of treatment, and the extent or stage of the disease. In the assessment of a person with cancer, all relevant Tables should be applied, while avoiding double counting. People who have terminal cancer, where the average life expectancy of a patient is more likely than not to be 24 months or less and there is a significant reduction in work capacity within this period, are manifestly qualified for DSP. |
Migraine |
If a person experiences impairment to neurological or cognitive function, (for example, where severe pain may impair the person's abilities with regard to attention and concentration or comprehension), then Table 7 - Brain Function can be used. Table 1 - Functions requiring Physical Exertion and Stamina may also be suitable. |
Miscellaneous ear/nose/throat conditions |
Functional impairments resulting from ear, nose and throat conditions would be commonly assessed using Table 8 - Communication Function, and Table 11 - Hearing and Other Functions of the Ear, depending on the individual’s particular circumstances. For example:
To avoid double counting, it is important not to assess the same functional impairment more than once. |
Class III (morbid) obesity |
Class III (morbid) obesity in adults is defined as a body mass index (BMI) of equal to or greater than 40 kg/m2. A BMI of greater than or equal to 40 is generally considered to be incompatible with long term good health, however, does not necessarily correlate with significant functional impact. The functional impact of class III obesity may range from minimal to very significant. In the assessment of a person with class III obesity, the Tables relevant to the area of function affected should be applied. For example:
Where class III obesity results in no or minimal functional impact, a rating of zero under Table 1 should be assigned. If class III obesity has resulted in other diagnosed, reasonably treated and stabilised secondary conditions, for example, osteoarthritis of the knee joints, the functional impacts of these conditions should be assigned a rating under the relevant Tables, such as Table 3 – Lower Limb Function. However, where 2 or more conditions cause a common or combined impairment, a single rating should be assigned in relation to that impairment under a single table. It is not reasonable to assign a separate impairment rating for each condition as this would result in the same impairment being assessed more than once. |
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) |
A person with MS may experience a range of symptoms and symptoms from MS can vary between people. In the assessment of a person with MS, all relevant Tables should be applied. For example:
|
Stroke |
A person who has suffered a stroke may have functional impairments in a number of areas depending on the part/s of the brain that have been damaged. In such cases, assessors should use all of the relevant Tables. For example:
|
Act reference: Social Security (Tables for the Assessment of Work-related Impairment for Disability Support Pension) Determination 2023 Part 2 Rules for applying the Impairment Tables, Table 1 - Functions requiring Physical Exertion and Stamina, Table 2 - Upper Limb Function, Table 3 - Lower Limb Function, Table 4 - Spinal Function, Table 5 - Mental Health Function, Table 7 - Brain Function, Table 8 - Communication Function, Table 9 - Intellectual Function, Table 10 - Digestive and Reproductive Function, Table 11 - Hearing and other Functions of the Ear, Table 12 - Visual Function, Table 13 - Continence Function, Table 14 - Functions of the Skin, Table 15 - Functions of Consciousness
Policy reference: SS Guide 1.1.H.60 Health Professional Advisory Unit (HPAU), 3.6.3.06 Guidelines to the rules for applying the Impairment Tables - selecting the applicable Table & assessing impairments, 3.6.3.10 Guidelines to Table 1 - Functions requiring Physical Exertion and Stamina, 3.6.3.20 Guidelines to Table 2 - Upper Limb Function, 3.6.3.30 Guidelines to Table 3 - Lower Limb Function, 3.6.3.40 Guidelines to Table 4 - Spinal Function, 3.6.3.50 Guidelines to Table 5 - Mental Health Function, 3.6.3.70 Guidelines to Table 7 - Brain Function, 3.6.3.80 Guidelines to Table 8 - Communication Function, 3.6.3.90 Guidelines to Table 9 - Intellectual Function, 3.6.3.100 Guidelines to Table 10 - Digestive and Reproductive Function, 3.6.3.110 Guidelines to Table 11 - Hearing and Other Functions of the Ear, 3.6.3.120 Guidelines to Table 12 - Visual Function, 3.6.3.130 Guidelines to Table 13 - Continence Function, 3.6.3.140 Guidelines to Table 14 - Functions of the Skin, 3.6.3.150 Guidelines to Table 15 - Functions of Consciousness